There are countless people round the people who are almost literally dying to shed excess fat the easy way. There have been 2 recent cases of death by liposuction recently in the press in the Klang Valley.
What's on offer is endless.
Easy way out fat loss can essentially be divided into:
1) traditional liposuction -whether it is ultrasound assisted or laser assisted ("laserlipolysis") or plain vacuum suction, liposuction is liposuction i.e. an invasive cannula is shoved into the fat area & suction is applied to remove the fat. Whether this procedure is life-threatening or whether it works to your expectations depends very much on your choice of surgeon & pre-op counselling.
2) Chemical fat dissolution (injection lipolysis, "Lipodissolve", "Lipostabil", "mesolipo")
This involves injections of a cocktail of drugs/homeopathic ingredients (which purport to dissolve the fat) directly into the fat layer of the skin. The drugs break down the fat walls, liberating the fats which are "gotten rid of via the body's normal metabolic pathways". In other words, the fats don't magically disappear into thin air - you still need to exercise to burn it off or eat fewer calories in order for your body to burn it off with normal activities. If you eat more than you can burn off, the "dissolved fats" will just go through the body & get recycled & stored elsewhere in the body again - where? Nobody knows, maybe in blood vessels where it may add to fatty plaques, block arteries & cause heart attacks & strokes.
Remember, fats don't magically disappear, you have to burn them off or get them sucked out.
www.lipotreatmentfacts.org/lipofaq.php provides a nice summary of this topic.
I personally think this is a very promising method of removing stubborn pockets of fat in people with a normal range body mass index (i.e. <25). However, safe protocols (i.e. maximum safe dose, where to inject, etc) need to be determined before it can be recommended en masse. There are some ongoing FDA approved trials on phosphatidylcholine/deoxycholate injections & we should see protocols being published by 2010.
3) Machine assisted fat emulsification ("Ultrashape", Thermage & thousands of brands of radiofrequency machines - Accent, Ultracountour, "Ultrasonic lipolysis", etc , etc)
Ultrashape uses ultrasound waves to disrupt fat cells by breaking down the membranes, causing release of free fatty acids which are transported to the liver or other tissues that need them as energy. The liver cannot differentiate between fatty acids that originate from disrupted fat cells from Ultrashape or those originating from a meal consumed several hours ago. In other words, the machine will disrupt the fat cell at the treated site but you'll still need to burn off the fatty acids released. See the above.
Radiofrequency or low level laser will cause a transitory pore in the cell membrane to open & cause the fat to go from inside to outside the cell. Again , the fat needs to be burnt off other wise it will just redeposit in the body.
Whatever treatment (mentioned above) you choose, you have to accept that these are only ways to remove targeted areas of fat. It doesn't replace a healthy calorie-controlled diet & exercise to keep you healthy & your weight in check. There is no miracle fat loss procedure that works by you just lying down with no need to sweat or risk your life with invasive surgery.
Sunday, June 28, 2009
"Fat jabs" summary 2008
Recent months have had a raft of bad news about injection lipolysis. Two prominent medical spas whose business was providing the popular
treatments abruptly closed their doors, leaving patients in the lurch.
Then, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts took action to strictly controlthe practice, a few months after trying to ban it.
Dr. Joel Schlessinger, immediate past president of the American Society of Cosmetic Dermatology and Aesthetic Surgery, warned the society that lipolysis might be neither effective nor safe, and he urged society members not to practice lipolysis until the ingredients used in the injections become Food and Drug Administration approved.
Recent news articles about this increasingly practiced treatment,
popularly known as Lipodissolve, have tended to focus on individuals who complain of having permanent nodules or indentations from the procedure or who tell of rushing to the emergency department.
On the Web site www.realself.com, where
consumers rate cosmetic procedures, it was reported as of Feb. 18 that 62% of the individuals who posted comments about their own Lipodissolve procedures said they were dissatisfied.
The Web site reported that an analysis of the IP addresses of the
reviewers showed that many of the positive reviews came from one of the two now-defunct companies, Go Fig Inc., without the authors identifying themselves, and some came from MedSculpt (both companies are now out of business).
But while agreeing that better regulation might be a good idea,
physicians who perform the procedure think that their experience and
studies suggest the risks of complications are quite low and the
results, in properly selected patients, generally good.
Support for Mesotherapy
“Injection lipolysis is not without risk, but it is pretty darn safe,” said Dr. Thomas Wright, an internist who has a cosmetic practice in suburban St. Louis. He has been collecting reports of cases and complications from members of the American Society of Nonsurgical Aesthetics.
In reviewing about 200,000 treatment cases either reported to him or
that he has sought out, he has found only 2 definite cases in which
there was a serious complication. Both were cases of skin ulceration at or near sites of injection that needed skin graft repair. Overall, he said that he has found about 20 cases of skin breakdown or a pigment change, though some of those were extremely small, a millimeter in size. He reported having recorded no other confirmed complications.
“We've been using injection lipolysis in my clinic for 2 years now and getting excellent results,” said Dr. Charles E. Crutchfield III, a dermatologist who practices in Minneapolis.
Dr. Crutchfield said the only serious complications he has seen or heard of are cases of skin ulceration. It is thought ulceration happens because of injections placed too superficially.
Dr. Crutchfield is a member of the medical advisory board of the
American Society of Aesthetic Lipodissolve, a professional organization that owns a copyright on the term Lipodissolve and provides training in the procedure. Dr. Wright is also a medical advisory board member with the group.
Reports of Complications Conflict
Andrew Noel, a photographer from Las Vegas, had treatments at a Go Fig spa, and he said that 4 months after his last treatment, he still has welts “the size of 50-cent pieces” on his abdomen where he received the injections. “My tummy is disfigured and I am steaming mad,” he said.
Dr. Alastair Carruthers, a dermatologist in Vancouver, B.C., has seen two patients who had complications presumed to be from Lipodissolve treatments, the first in a woman who was injected in her lower eyelids and the second in a woman injected in her thighs.The second woman developed significant ulceration that caused scarring,Dr. Carruthers said.
Dr. Elizabeth Tanzi, a dermatologist in practice in Washington, has seen four patients with complications from Lipodissolve treatment, two with “an unnatural firmness” that resolved only slowly, one with a vascular pattern over the treated area that lasted for a year and required laser treatment, and another patient who had a draining nodule.
But surveys, like Dr. Wright's, of physicians who practice injection
lipolysis suggest that the procedure—while sometimes causing discomfort and leaving temporary nodules in treated areas that resolve over time—only rarely has complications.
And another survey of 75 practitioners reported that among 17,376
patients treated there were no hospitalizations, no deaths, and no cases of skin necrosis (Aesthetic Surg. J. 2006;26:575–85). Moreover, less than 1% of patients reported to their physicians pain that lasted beyond 2 weeks, and the most common complaint of patients was a less than desired result, reported for 12% of patients. Nineteen of the practitioners reported having seen hyperpigmentation, but in the
majority of cases this resolved within 3 months.
Safety Concerns
Another of the concerns with lipolysis treatment is whether there might be long-term effects from phosphatidylcholine or sodium deoxycholate, or acute problems from exposure to those ingredients or from the release of so much fat at once.
The substances are both naturally present in the human body already, and used the way they are to reduce fat, have only “relatively benign,localized effects,” said Dr. Adam Rotunda, a physician who now works as a medical director of research and development at Allergan Inc., but who conducted research on injection lipolysis as a dermatology resident at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Dr. Rotunda has a patent for a formulation of sodium deoxycholate
(licensed to Kythera Biopharmaceuticals Inc.) alone for injection
lipolysis, which he claims might be as effective as the phosphatidylcholine/sodium deoxycholate combination. That formulation is at present in clinical trials. Dr. Rotunda has no financial interest in the product, though he has received consulting fees from Kythera. The licensing fees are paid to the University of California, Los Angeles, he disclosed.
A Flawed Business Plan?
Dr. Wright said he is very familiar with one of the now-defunct
companies, Fig, which was based in the St. Louis area. He is not only
well acquainted with the former principals in the company, but he has
treated about 30 former Fig patients. And he suggests that many of the complaints and complications being reported about injection lipolysis come from Fig clients, who were guaranteed results or a refund.
The company often had no physician onsite at its locations and many
sometimes used doses too high and treated inappropriate patients. Dr.
Wright recalled one patient who went to a Fig location every month for a year to be treated and never once saw a physician.
“The company was selling to inappropriate candidates and overselling,” he said.
Many Fig patients that Dr. Wright said he treated were extremely
overweight, and the proper candidate for lipolysis is one who is not
overweight but simply has a localized area with a small amount of fat
they would like to be rid of. Fig—which had 18 locations in various
states—ceased its operations in December and filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy in January. The other prominent company that recently closed was MedSculpt, a firm with locations in Rockville, Md., and Fairfax, Va., which went into receivership in January.
Officials from both companies were unavailable for comment, and
physicians connected with the companies either declined to comment or
did not return calls and e-mails. However, in statements, Fig
representatives said their investors pulled funding, and blamed the
situation in part on a downturn in customers and bad press. MedSculpt
needed a cash infusion and had investors lined up, but when Fig closed those investors balked, the representatives claim.
Recent Studies
Two studies have looked at whether the treatment has any identifiable
systemic effects, and neither found any, said Dr. Rotunda. “We don't
have the quality of data we need, but what we do have is pretty reassuring.”
Brazilian investigators treated 30 patients with a series of four
sessions of abdominal injections of sodium deoxycholate and looked at
the local and systemic effects. At different time periods—ranging from 2 hours after an injection to 12 weeks—they measured lipids and kidney and liver function and found no significant changes (Dermatol. Surg.2007;33:178–89).
In his own work, Dr. Rotunda has found that injecting phosphatidylcholine and sodium deoxycholate can produce changes in
muscle architecture but the substances have to be injected directly into the muscles (Dermatol. Surg. 2004;30:1001–8).
Patients can experience nausea from the procedure, but that appears to be a cholinergic effect that occurs when too high a dose is used, he said.
Currently the evidence of the efficacy of injection lipolysis is
anecdotal. But in November, a clinical trial of the combination solution got underway, sponsored by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation, run by Dr. V. Leroy Young, a former professor of plastic and reconstructive surgery at Washington University, St. Louis, who is now in private practice. The trial will enroll 20 subjects, who will be
followed for 46 weeks.
In the meantime, both Dr. Crutchfield and Dr. Wright said they would
have no problem if the FDA or some other agency came to regulate
lipolysis procedures or the compounded ingredients used.
But Dr. Crutchfield also noted that injection lipolysis is not the first cosmetic product to be used off-label, and he cited Botox as an example. Botox was used cosmetically before its approval and currently is used in locations where it is not approved.
“If you are going to talk about this lacking FDA approval as a reason
physicians should not be doing it, you are going to have to point the
finger at everybody who does Botox,” Dr. Crutchfield said.
treatments abruptly closed their doors, leaving patients in the lurch.
Then, the Kansas Board of Healing Arts took action to strictly controlthe practice, a few months after trying to ban it.
Dr. Joel Schlessinger, immediate past president of the American Society of Cosmetic Dermatology and Aesthetic Surgery, warned the society that lipolysis might be neither effective nor safe, and he urged society members not to practice lipolysis until the ingredients used in the injections become Food and Drug Administration approved.
Recent news articles about this increasingly practiced treatment,
popularly known as Lipodissolve, have tended to focus on individuals who complain of having permanent nodules or indentations from the procedure or who tell of rushing to the emergency department.
On the Web site www.realself.com
consumers rate cosmetic procedures, it was reported as of Feb. 18 that 62% of the individuals who posted comments about their own Lipodissolve procedures said they were dissatisfied.
The Web site reported that an analysis of the IP addresses of the
reviewers showed that many of the positive reviews came from one of the two now-defunct companies, Go Fig Inc., without the authors identifying themselves, and some came from MedSculpt (both companies are now out of business).
But while agreeing that better regulation might be a good idea,
physicians who perform the procedure think that their experience and
studies suggest the risks of complications are quite low and the
results, in properly selected patients, generally good.
Support for Mesotherapy
“Injection lipolysis is not without risk, but it is pretty darn safe,” said Dr. Thomas Wright, an internist who has a cosmetic practice in suburban St. Louis. He has been collecting reports of cases and complications from members of the American Society of Nonsurgical Aesthetics.
In reviewing about 200,000 treatment cases either reported to him or
that he has sought out, he has found only 2 definite cases in which
there was a serious complication. Both were cases of skin ulceration at or near sites of injection that needed skin graft repair. Overall, he said that he has found about 20 cases of skin breakdown or a pigment change, though some of those were extremely small, a millimeter in size. He reported having recorded no other confirmed complications.
“We've been using injection lipolysis in my clinic for 2 years now and getting excellent results,” said Dr. Charles E. Crutchfield III, a dermatologist who practices in Minneapolis.
Dr. Crutchfield said the only serious complications he has seen or heard of are cases of skin ulceration. It is thought ulceration happens because of injections placed too superficially.
Dr. Crutchfield is a member of the medical advisory board of the
American Society of Aesthetic Lipodissolve, a professional organization that owns a copyright on the term Lipodissolve and provides training in the procedure. Dr. Wright is also a medical advisory board member with the group.
Reports of Complications Conflict
Andrew Noel, a photographer from Las Vegas, had treatments at a Go Fig spa, and he said that 4 months after his last treatment, he still has welts “the size of 50-cent pieces” on his abdomen where he received the injections. “My tummy is disfigured and I am steaming mad,” he said.
Dr. Alastair Carruthers, a dermatologist in Vancouver, B.C., has seen two patients who had complications presumed to be from Lipodissolve treatments, the first in a woman who was injected in her lower eyelids and the second in a woman injected in her thighs.The second woman developed significant ulceration that caused scarring,Dr. Carruthers said.
Dr. Elizabeth Tanzi, a dermatologist in practice in Washington, has seen four patients with complications from Lipodissolve treatment, two with “an unnatural firmness” that resolved only slowly, one with a vascular pattern over the treated area that lasted for a year and required laser treatment, and another patient who had a draining nodule.
But surveys, like Dr. Wright's, of physicians who practice injection
lipolysis suggest that the procedure—while sometimes causing discomfort and leaving temporary nodules in treated areas that resolve over time—only rarely has complications.
And another survey of 75 practitioners reported that among 17,376
patients treated there were no hospitalizations, no deaths, and no cases of skin necrosis (Aesthetic Surg. J. 2006;26:575–85). Moreover, less than 1% of patients reported to their physicians pain that lasted beyond 2 weeks, and the most common complaint of patients was a less than desired result, reported for 12% of patients. Nineteen of the practitioners reported having seen hyperpigmentation, but in the
majority of cases this resolved within 3 months.
Safety Concerns
Another of the concerns with lipolysis treatment is whether there might be long-term effects from phosphatidylcholine or sodium deoxycholate, or acute problems from exposure to those ingredients or from the release of so much fat at once.
The substances are both naturally present in the human body already, and used the way they are to reduce fat, have only “relatively benign,localized effects,” said Dr. Adam Rotunda, a physician who now works as a medical director of research and development at Allergan Inc., but who conducted research on injection lipolysis as a dermatology resident at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Dr. Rotunda has a patent for a formulation of sodium deoxycholate
(licensed to Kythera Biopharmaceuticals Inc.) alone for injection
lipolysis, which he claims might be as effective as the phosphatidylcholine/sodium deoxycholate combination. That formulation is at present in clinical trials. Dr. Rotunda has no financial interest in the product, though he has received consulting fees from Kythera. The licensing fees are paid to the University of California, Los Angeles, he disclosed.
A Flawed Business Plan?
Dr. Wright said he is very familiar with one of the now-defunct
companies, Fig, which was based in the St. Louis area. He is not only
well acquainted with the former principals in the company, but he has
treated about 30 former Fig patients. And he suggests that many of the complaints and complications being reported about injection lipolysis come from Fig clients, who were guaranteed results or a refund.
The company often had no physician onsite at its locations and many
sometimes used doses too high and treated inappropriate patients. Dr.
Wright recalled one patient who went to a Fig location every month for a year to be treated and never once saw a physician.
“The company was selling to inappropriate candidates and overselling,” he said.
Many Fig patients that Dr. Wright said he treated were extremely
overweight, and the proper candidate for lipolysis is one who is not
overweight but simply has a localized area with a small amount of fat
they would like to be rid of. Fig—which had 18 locations in various
states—ceased its operations in December and filed for chapter 11
bankruptcy in January. The other prominent company that recently closed was MedSculpt, a firm with locations in Rockville, Md., and Fairfax, Va., which went into receivership in January.
Officials from both companies were unavailable for comment, and
physicians connected with the companies either declined to comment or
did not return calls and e-mails. However, in statements, Fig
representatives said their investors pulled funding, and blamed the
situation in part on a downturn in customers and bad press. MedSculpt
needed a cash infusion and had investors lined up, but when Fig closed those investors balked, the representatives claim.
Recent Studies
Two studies have looked at whether the treatment has any identifiable
systemic effects, and neither found any, said Dr. Rotunda. “We don't
have the quality of data we need, but what we do have is pretty reassuring.”
Brazilian investigators treated 30 patients with a series of four
sessions of abdominal injections of sodium deoxycholate and looked at
the local and systemic effects. At different time periods—ranging from 2 hours after an injection to 12 weeks—they measured lipids and kidney and liver function and found no significant changes (Dermatol. Surg.2007;33:178–89).
In his own work, Dr. Rotunda has found that injecting phosphatidylcholine and sodium deoxycholate can produce changes in
muscle architecture but the substances have to be injected directly into the muscles (Dermatol. Surg. 2004;30:1001–8).
Patients can experience nausea from the procedure, but that appears to be a cholinergic effect that occurs when too high a dose is used, he said.
Currently the evidence of the efficacy of injection lipolysis is
anecdotal. But in November, a clinical trial of the combination solution got underway, sponsored by the Aesthetic Surgery Education and Research Foundation, run by Dr. V. Leroy Young, a former professor of plastic and reconstructive surgery at Washington University, St. Louis, who is now in private practice. The trial will enroll 20 subjects, who will be
followed for 46 weeks.
In the meantime, both Dr. Crutchfield and Dr. Wright said they would
have no problem if the FDA or some other agency came to regulate
lipolysis procedures or the compounded ingredients used.
But Dr. Crutchfield also noted that injection lipolysis is not the first cosmetic product to be used off-label, and he cited Botox as an example. Botox was used cosmetically before its approval and currently is used in locations where it is not approved.
“If you are going to talk about this lacking FDA approval as a reason
physicians should not be doing it, you are going to have to point the
finger at everybody who does Botox,” Dr. Crutchfield said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)